Digital Pathology Basics: Image Viewers vs. Image Management Systems

Image Viewer vs IMS comparison

In brief

As digital pathology becomes more integrated into clinical, academic, and research settings, it’s important to distinguish between the tools used in this domain. Two common types of software encountered are pathology slide viewers and digital pathology image management systems (IMS). While they may appear similar on the surface (both enable users to access and interact with digital slides) they are fundamentally different in terms of scope, features, and intended use.

Pathology Slide Viewer: A Focused Viewing Tool

A pathology slide viewer is a software application designed primarily for visualizing digitized pathology slides, also known as whole slide images (WSIs). These tools typically allow users to open and navigate high-resolution scans of tissue specimens. Common features include zooming, panning, rotation, and the ability to add simple annotations or measurements.

These viewers can be used by pathologists for reviewing cases, by students for learning, or by researchers for image analysis. They may be standalone desktop applications or web-based platforms. Some viewers are vendor-specific, tied to a particular scanner or image format, while others are open source or multi-format compatible. However, pathology slide viewers are limited in scope. Their main purpose is to enable manual, visual inspection of slides. They typically do not provide broader workflow functionality, user management, or system integrations. For small-scale or individual use, slide viewers are handy tools. But their limitations will quickly become apparent.

Digital Pathology Image Management System (IMS): A Comprehensive Platform

In contrast, a digital pathology image management system (IMS) such as PathPresenter is a comprehensive, enterprise-grade software solution that manages the entire lifecycle of digital pathology data. It includes not only the viewing of whole slide images, but also the organization, tracking, analysis, and sharing of those images in clinical and research workflows. An enterprise deployment of an integrated digital pathology workflow will almost certainly require a fully featured IMS.

IMS connects all the pieces for a seamless workflow

A robust IMS typically includes the following core capabilities:

Key Differences and Use Cases

While both a slide viewer and an IMS allow for digital slide visualization, their purposes differ greatly. A slide viewer is ideal for simple, low-volume, or individual use cases, such as academic review, research projects without extensive collaboration, or basic diagnostic reference. It is generally easy to deploy and use, and may come free of charge or at a low cost.

A digital pathology IMS, on the other hand, is suitable for high-volume, regulated environments such as hospitals, diagnostic labs, and collaborative research institutions. These systems are designed to scale with demand, handle multi-user scenarios, and provide robust governance and compliance. They also support complex workflows involving multiple roles, locations, and datasets.

Choosing between a viewer and an IMS depends on the specific requirements of the organization or individual, whether it’s ease of access and simplicity, or full integration, scalability, and workflow optimization.

More Information

Not sure if a viewer or IMS is right for you? Connect with our team to assess your workflow needs and explore the best solution.